Despite the ridiculous Lamia question, it was a very accessible paper. We had written essays in response to both questions in Section B and those who chose Coleridge in Section A will have been pleased to have prepared a response in the revision session to exactly the same questions. I thought that Keats A (b) was very accessible too.
Those who chose Keats in Section A should not worry unduly: as long as you applied the skills that have been drummed into you when approaching A (a) you should be fine.
I think that you will agree that there is nothing else that we could have done to prepare. It is a huge, sprawling course and we each did everything possible to cover as much ground as possible in preparation.
I was also thrilled to see so many of you making such an effort in the final stages. It seemed that everyone had revised hard. I would like to thank you all for your hard work on the course; let's hope that it has produced some good results!
Enjoy activities week and I'll see you for some literary theory when you return.
Mr. Denchfield
Wednesday, 9 June 2010
Tuesday, 1 June 2010
Great Expectations revision
This looks like a very helpful revision guide: http://www.teachit.co.uk/armoore/prose/greatexpectations.htm#40
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
